RadonGOG: Yes, that´s right if you look at the first game bought, but I was viewing at ALL games bought by one person on GOG.com that is WILLING to buy tons of games on here (which applies to all "believers" around)!
Let me do an example: Person buys first game on GOG for 7€ (5€+2€ FPP), then buys a game for 5€ (7€-2€), one for 14€ (10€+4€ FPP), then one for 0€ (4€-4€).
Total money spend: 7+5+4+0=26 [€]
Total money spend with FairPricingOutOfTheBox: 5+7+10+4= 26 [€]
You see that there isn´t any problem for the "believers"?Espacially if you remember that it´ll never expise---> and even this wouldn´t be a problem, as a believer is buying fast enough to avoid such a problem... :D
It's still not the same, because:
- One has to spend
more money at the time of purchase, money they might not be able to spare at that time to spend on a game.
- The extra money is then tied up here, i.e. like a down-payment for a future purchase, again money that one may not be able to spare at the time.
- The store credit expires within a year of date of purchase.
Being a believer has nth to do with being able to constantly purchase games so that the "down payments"/ store credit don't get stuck in limbo. Life is unpredictable and one can unexpectedly face long term financial changes/ difficulties that would force them to prioritise, even to the point of not being able to allocate any amount on games for weeks or even months.
GOG's FPP is laudable, but it's far from ideal, plus it doesn't help steer things into the right direction (i.e. change of an industry practice), and if the flood of regionally priced games released lately is anything to go by, it appears to have already put them into a disadvantageous position in terms of negotiating power for flat prices.
I don't claim to know an easy and commercially viable solution to this, but I'm sceptical about where things are going.