Unacosamedarisa: It's not just the negative 0/10 reviews. There are far more numerous 10/10 reviews, given to the game within a few hours of it going live/playable. When everyone was ranting about the M_Stannard 0/10 review, no one was saying anything about the other 70 reviews (out of 71) all giving 10/10, and all as equally false as the M_Stannard review. Looking at it just now, there are only a handful of user reviews that give a score other than 0 or 10.
I think it shows one of the problems with MetaCritic... that user reviews like this can be 'played' so easily.
BTW, don't get me wrong, I'm loving this game... it's fantastic so far. And, once I'm done with it I reckon I could quite possibly give it a "10/10", although more likely to be 9/10. Just I think the numerous 10/10 reviews, saying things like "Even The Witcher 1 is better than any Dragon Age ever will be" are just as bad as the 0/10's.
I agree, however a happy medium needs to be found. Especially with corporations like EA paying for reviews.