You didn't watch TB's video on Embargos did you?
*sigh* Embargos are a good thing (
when they don't censor information of a game until after it's release). Embargos are in place to not only make sure reviews are at a reasonable point near time of release, but they also make sure that if everyone agrees not to give reviews of a product until the same time, then they don't have to rush and make mistakes and errors in order to be the
First site posting, instead they all post at the same time.
As
TB said, quite often Embargos are verbal and don't usually require a signature or anything legally binding, but posting information and breaking Embargo although quite easy, you can only do once because companies will have very long memories, and very few will send you review copies of a game if they know you won't honor the Embargo date.
The problem is when the Embargo is set after the game's release, as it effectively censors critical information, but you usually have to accept the Embargo to get a review copy... Sorta catch-22.
TB has stated if he sees games like this he will give a big warning regarding it, as it could be a hint that the game isn't any good (
or released broken) and they are trying to maximize sales while there's no information out about the game.